No. They're identical. Literally a waste of money unless...maybe...if you go down to the absolute lowest models then...maybe...they won't be safe if you want to run the card at 600 W even that I doubt but...maybe.Hi all, been lurking on this thread for a while as been wanting to upgrade my 6900xt for better VR performance. Can anyone tell me though whether it's actually worth spending several hundred more £ on a 'better' AIB card? For instance there's a Gainward Phantom for £1549 here in the UK, vs a MSI Gaming X Trio for £1748, or at the higher end a Suprim X for £1899, all have solid reviews, but can anyone suggest I will be getting better real world performance for the extra £? For the record I'm not super bothered about noise as running a wind sim which will drown out anything (rig only used for sim), and heat shouldn't be too much of a problem as case is very cooling focused. Are there any other things I should consider? (Aside from the fact they are still ridiculously expensive!)
I have the MSI Gaming non-X Trio (non-'X" means non-"OC" model). It doesn't have the vapor chamber cooler, it also won't allow you to go past 450 W (even though it's supposed to allow 480 W with the power limit slider). Further more, it only comes with a 3-PCI-E adapter instead of 4 which sort of hard-limits it to 450 W.
I got a 4 PCI-E adapter and first flashed the MSI Suprim X BIOS for 520 W out of curiosity, and then the Gigabyte Gaming BIOS for 600 W. Now I can run the card to it's fullest. I have the memory at +1000 and the core OC'd so it always runs close to 3100 MHz without dropping thanks to the power limit...all while staying in the 60s degrees.
Those clockspeeds are not any better than with the original BIOS overclock but now the core clock speeds don't drop, or barely do, unless reaching 600 W which 99.9 % of games won't do.
Anyone paying hundreds and hundreds of dollars more for higher models is LITERALLY wasting their money for absolutely nothing. Think of the stupidly, ridiculous huge and expensive ASUS ROG Strix. Humungous card but, what's worse is it's absolutely insanely overpriced price while, in reality, offering nothing except e-peen.
With regards to overclocking:
- unlike most cards, the 4090 usually gains more from memory clocks than core. If you get a card that, say, allows +1500 MHz on the memory but can't do more than, say, 2975 MHz on the core, you got a good card
- don't waste your money paying extra for the more overclocked versions like the "OC", the "X", etc. You can literally do the same with an OCing program like MSI Afterburner. Those cards, nor higher model cards in general, don't have any better chance to overclock more than non-"OC" chips. It's literally just a money grab directed towards uneducated consumers. The models that have chips which are tested to be able to overclock more (AKA binned chips) are usually only special, highly limited edition cards like EVGA "Kingpin" cards of previous generations. I don't even think the limited edition Galax OC Lab / OC Lab Plus 4090 with 666 W power limit and 2x 12VHPWR connectors is binned (but not 100% sure).
- with regards to binning and 4090s, there are people suggesting that Nvidia is keeping the better chips for themselves for their 4090 FE versions - especially with regards to memory. Some people have said that the FE cards have a higher chance of OCing the memory to the +1400 - +1800 range than non-FE cards but take this with a gran of salt; it's what some people are saying but I haven't researched it enough (nor do I care to) to be entirely convinced of it.
P.S. You can still easily be GPU-limited with a 4090.
Last edited: